On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Trejkaz Xaoza wrote: >> Seems like a cool feature.. but somehow I really think that I have >> enough trouble allready with explaining end-users when filetransfer will >> work and when it won't. >> This "short circuit" will not clear anything up here.. > It won't make it any worse, either. A file transfer wouldn't have worked via > JIT before, and it still won't work now. Easy. :-)
If the gateway supported direct ICQ connections, the need for internal shortcuts wouldn't even arise, so I'd suggest adding this functionality instead. "Shortcuts" are also bad from a political point of view. I'd rather like gateways to send "You're talking to a person that actually uses Jabber, please use Jabber instead" ;-) than providing support for this strange behaviour. Otherwise, the Jabber network once again tries to compete with multi-network IM clients. > Perhaps what the transport should do is inform each user of their > silliness, and push the users' JIDs to each other so that they can talk > directly. :-) :-) Regards _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
