Le mardi 30 novembre 2004 � 15:34 +0000, Richard Dobson a �crit : > > No: when I'm DnD for IM, then certainly I'm DnD for VoIP (also known as > > "away"). But when I'm in a voip call, I'm certainly still able to read > > IM messages: this is a presence information, and it can't be guessed > > from the IM presence. > > Ah but the presence stanza is intended to indicate your IM presence not your > phone presence if that is something separate, if you really do need to > express your VoIP presence info separately then you must keep it separate > from the IM presence by not using the <presence/> stanza, what you need to > look at using is pubsub instead.
Gaim puts "jabber:x:delay" information in presence... why couldn't it put a voip-uri? > Overall tho I am not sure you are quite understanding things correctly, the > presence stanza is not intended to communicate anything other than your IM > presence, if you want to express VoIP presence as something different from > the IM presence it must be carried using pubsub just as other protocols for > communicating such things user mood have done (these protocols are > collectively known as extended presence). Also "jabber:x:oob" is not > intended to communicate anything other than a URI which in the case of VoIP > URI's will always be an invitation to the indicated VoIP session, it cannot > be used to indicate a user is currently in a call, and in any case > indicating that a user is in a VoIP call using a VoIP URI which is received > by people that are not in the call is a potensial security hole as only > people actually in the call should ever have that information. I don't see where the security issue is... all of your contacts can send you messages anytime they want and you don't consider it a security issue ; but allowing the same contacts to call you is one?! I'm studying the pubsub jep so I can't comment about it yet. JP _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
