On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 19:39:06 +0100, Tijl Houtbeckers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the intention of 115 is to prevent many disco requests being send, > what about all those protocols that are currently stuck in "waiting for > Disco" mode. Can you please provide an itemized list of the jeps which are in "waiting for disco" mode? > Will 115 be enough to meet their needs? If so, do they > already take 115 into account? If not, what should be done with disco? > (Perhaps in relation to 115) What are you talking about? 115 does not superscede Disco in any way shap or form. > With hindsight, I think we could have benifited from a generic way to use > presence in an optimized way, that would be easy to migrate PubSub if > needed. Too late for that now.. or is it? JEP-115 _IS_ the optimized way to use presence to discover stuff. Thats the whole point. pgm. _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
