In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 Ralph Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 02:35:36PM -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
> > Ah, true, that's the right place to do it. Sounds like an Internet-Draft 
> > may be in order... ;-)
> 
> I don't understand the distinction here. Isn't that what the anonymous 
> mechanism you suggested does?
> 
>  -r

Yeah, ignore what I said. Actually what we need is an informational JEP 
that describes the process I laid out so that at least we have it 
documented. Or perhaps it simply belongs in rfc3920bis.

/psa

_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev

Reply via email to