"I SEE!!" said the blind man to the deaf man as he pissed into the
wind... "It's all coming back to me!"
I get it... so what you're saying is that given :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Psi
I should do :
Nodeprep("venkata") + "@" + Nameprep("68.101.84.233") + "/" +
Resourceprep("Psi")
Well, I've implemented it and it seems that it didn't do a thing to
the JID's... they're all the same, which explains why your hash came
out right. Well, now mine matches yours and so now I guess we're on
the same page as far as the SHA1 goes, but it still doesn't work,
still gives me the "Unknown Host" exception. :(
Thanks for the assist on the hash Magnus!
As for the SOCKS5 connection problem... anyone have any ideas?
Anthony
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:28:24 +0100, Magnus Henoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Thanks for the quick reply, but there's no problem with the SHA-1 due to :
> >
> > 1) The difference in our hash results is due to your applying SHA1(sid
> > + from + to) rather than SHA1(sid + Stringprep.nameprep(from + to)),
> > which in this particular case simply transforms the from and to
> > variables to all lowercase. So your hash is based on a string
> > containing uppercase characters while mine was based on lowercase
> > characters, and the protocol specifically states that the JID's need
> > to be Stringprepped, so I assume my hash is correct.
>
> Ah... I didn't think about that.
>
> But it seems that I accidentally generated the correct hash. The
> resources should be stringprepped according to the Resourceprep
> profile, which doesn't fold case, even though both the username (by
> Nodeprep) and the server (by Nameprep) do. So you need to split the
> JIDs and stringprep the parts separately.
>
> Magnus
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
>
_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
