On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 08:15:13AM +1100, Trejkaz wrote: > On Wednesday 02 March 2005 11:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > better use ejabberd > > Using ejabberd wouldn't really help the OP test code against jabberd2, would > it now? Unless ejabberd is based on jabberd2 now...
As far as I understood, the point was to test client against modern (XMPP?) protocol features. In this case testing against ejabberd is as good as against jabberd2. On the other case installing ejabberd in Windows is much easier than jabberd2. -- Sergei Golovan _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
