On Wednesday 23 March 2005 02:07 pm, Julian Missig wrote: > I don't mean to be presumptuous or rude, but I really don't think > you've thought through DNS-SD and how peer-to-peer Jabber would work > with it nearly enough...
Probably not. I was just trying to see how much of our own protocol we could re-use. I had not yet considered "oob"erizing presence. > There's a local subnet. It has 50 users on it. How are you expecting > that those 50 users will get one another's presence? DNS-SD means > that we can treat the "service" as a presence packet (because really, > it is advertising the availability of a service) and advertise our > presence as a DNS-SD service. There's no need to open up 50 TCP > connections and send <presence/> packets to all 50. It's all handled > by Multicast DNS for us. There's no "Jabber connection" taking place > until one user wants to send a message to another--then we're opening > a TCP socket and sending a <message>. Does this mean that <presence> is never delivered over a Jabber connection, even if there is an existing connection due to some message exchanging? What about directed presence? -Justin _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list jdev@jabber.org http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
