Oh!!! For some reason I thought this was all after the whole negotiation process... of course, of course.... hmmmm. It would seem a simple matter of modifying the JEP-105 then, no?
cheers! Anthony On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:32:03 -0800, Justin Karneges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Anthony, > > On Friday 25 March 2005 07:09 pm, Anthony Ortiz wrote: > > the issue. I see that the status of this JEP is now deferred... does > > this mean multiple file xfer support is now dead?? I for one would > > like to see this JEP resurrected.... calling it overkill would be like > > calling DOS overkill; sure, DOS has directory support *if* you wish to > > use it. If not, don't use it!! > > > > Or maybe I'm just failing to see the overkill, so if one of the > > naysayers could explain to me why it's overkill I would appreciate it. > > Well, the reason I dislike it, as I mentioned in an earlier mail, is that > JEP-105 goes through the whole file transfer negotiation process, including > JEP-65 (!), for _every_file_ to be transferred. We can do better than this. > > -Justin > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
