On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:19:41PM +0200, Matthias Wimmer wrote: > Hi Sergei! > > > > I don't think I want to implement alternate syntaxes for existing JEPs. > If it would add features not present in JEPs okay ... but a client just > using other commands because it does not like the syntax of a JEP - I > don't think this is a good idea.
I've just warned you about current Tkabber implementation in case if you want to use it for debugging jabberd. It's not a good idea because Tkabber doesn't implement JEP-0013 (as someone mentioned earlier in the list). > If you have concerns with a JEP - especially with one that is not final > yet - you should discuss them on the standards-jig. I don't want to discuss this JEP but I wonder how can any JEP be promoted to draft without any reference implementation? As for me it's nonsense. -- Sergei Golovan _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
