On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 05:02:46PM +0100, Richard Dobson wrote: > >>Just an observation but it might be nicer to call it > >>http://jabber.org/protocol/voiphelper or similar if you are going to > >>officially register it so we can leave voip for a future fully integrated > >>voip protocol. > > > >What about http://jabber.org/protocol/voip/helper for what I have in mind > >and http://jabber.org/protocol/voip/venice for a "future fully integrated > >protocol" called 'venice' (in case there are several of them)? > > Yea thats possible, although my suggestion is more consistent with past > usage, probably best to leave it up to Peter to pick.
Well, we still reserve URIs of the form http://jabber.org/protocol/* for JSF-approved protocols, but we could add other URI or string to the service discovery features registry. Peter _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
