On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 02:16, Ulrich Staudinger wrote: > I do agree with Richard, too. Transferring the encoded image data inline > in an HTML-IMG tag could waste bandwidth. > The hashing helps in this case.
In addition to this, there is a maximum length of an attribute in XML (was it
1024 characters?), and out of that you lose some for the prefix, and then the
remainder is in Base64. So the data: URL scheme will only take you so far,
and there does need to be another option for images which are bigger than the
tiny amount of space you can use.
TX
--
Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Web site: http://trypticon.org/
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
pgptXZOrGwxIO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
