On 5/13/05, Richard Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 1) Certification. > > > 2) Official JSF Projects. > > > I vote for another system: > > 3) Supported JSF Projects. This is a mix of 1) and 2), but it looks mostly > > like 2). The big advantage of this system, is that it can handle many > > projects, with less JSF efforts. > > Sorry but your suggestion does not sound like 2 at all, its simply 1 with a > few added things to certify like stability, ease of use etc, rather than > simply just protocol compliance, which sounds like a good compromise to me.
Agreed. Good things to measure, sure. But I am seeing certification as objective and Officla JSF as subjective. A combination of the two gives you the best of both worlds. I would hazard a guess that most users will care about subjective analysis and most developers would care about objective analysis. -- Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org) im:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://halr9000.com _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
