On 7/29/05, Justin Karneges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 29 July 2005 01:56 am, Vinod Panicker wrote: > > I was stating that the RFC is silent about stanza communications > > starting as soon as one connection is successful, before the > > complementary connection has been established. > > Good point, it could be interpretted that you must have both connections > established even if you are only sending in one direction.
Do I need to inform anyone specifically to get this added into the next version of the RFC or assume that it would be done? > > > Failed s2s connections can happen at any time, SASL or not. I don't > > > think a failed inbound s2s connection should have any effect on > > > established s2s connections. So in your example you'd be stuck with a > > > one-way channel. > > > > Any recommendations / standard practices on what to do in case of a > > situation like this? > > Do nothing? I'm pretty sure that's what all the existing servers do today. So can we safely state that if server A needs to send a stanza to server B, there is no need for server B to establish a connection to server A unless in the case of an error? Regards, Vinod. _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
