Any thoughts on this anyone? I know I'm being pedantic here ;)
On 8/10/05, Vinod Panicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > RFC 3920 states that - > > 4. If either entity receives a stream header with no 'version' > attribute, the entity MUST consider the version supported by the > other entity to be "0.0" and SHOULD NOT include a 'version' > attribute in the stream header it sends in reply. > > What is the definition / content of XMPP v0.0? What is a compliant > XMPP v0.0 entity expected to support? > > Regards, > Vinod. > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
