Hmmm... A whitelist of domains? Or users?
So a central server has the list of ten millions domain, a sub server when a new domain come will ask the central server for the GOOD or BAD. If the central point will fail this can cause service break. Imho the white/blacklist need be full decentralized, perhaps based on trust ranking. Ear mine idea: user1 want contact user2. User2 don't has user1 in buddylist (server side), the xmpp query a central database (distributed in some points), if the user1 is spam, then don't forward. A new xmpp draft extension, permit to collect informations about user spammer. The list will be ordered and if a user reach a MAX level of spam it become signaled. So: 1) a company can contact another company without be blocked 2) the spammer is blocked What you think? Roberto -----Messaggio originale----- Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Trejkaz Inviato: sabato 27 agosto 2005 12.54 A: Jabber software development list Oggetto: Re: R: R: [jdev] about spim techniques On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 20:20, Ian Paterson wrote: > The power of a single central authority would be open to abuse in the > future. Sure, but it would be abuse by a central authority which people can freely join, and doesn't seem to have anywhere to even hide a conspiracy if it wanted to. It would be pretty obvious if the JSF started being evil... members would start hearing about it on the members mailing list, for a start. :-) > What stops a spimer registering more servers before the first one is > blacklisted? I guess that would be done the same way free competitions prevent us putting in 2,000 entry forms. TX -- Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Web site: http://trypticon.org/ Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73 _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
