Trejkaz wrote:
Quoting Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:If clients recognize the message IDs, they could also include an In-Reply-To SHIM header as described in JEP-0131 and include the message ID there.Here's the problem though. Presumably the MUC service, operating as a component, has to assign new and unique message IDs to every message. Thatmeans that if both you and I are in the same conference room, the same messagewill have one ID when received by me, and one ID when received by you.
Yeah, using the "Message-ID" SHIM header (or something similar) would probably make more sense if someone ever wanted to build such a system.
Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
