On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 03:53:29 +0200, Perry Lorier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tijl Houtbeckers wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 03:36:09 +0200, Perry Lorier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Are you playing devil's advocate or are you serious? If I had to
guess,
I'd say that 99.9% of public XMPP servers are deployed at [domain].com
or [sub].[domain].com. They're not deployed at
[sub].[sub].[sub].[domain].com. This means that there are generally
never "unused" or "hardly used" domains up the tree from any
particular
XMPP server that somebody could stealthily take over.
We run our conference server on conference.jabber.meta.net.nz.
It the tld .net.nz or .nz?
The .nz cc-tld is broken up into several 2ld's .co, .net, .org, .gov,
,.gen, .maori, .school, .iwi, .geek, etc.
Yes, sorry.. I meant to ask if it was part of the split cc-tld, or if the
"net." part was a "for sale" domain. So in your case you're still running
on conference.[sub].[domain].[cc-tld]
But eg. .uk.com (not .com.uk!) is quite populair, while "uk.com" is really
just another .com domain (and a website even, promoting amongst other
things those gambling sites). So you could eg. have jabber.example.com.uk,
which is to put it in Matt's terms a [sub].[sub].[domain].com. I was
wondering if the same applied here, which is not the case.
