On Wednesday 26 October 2005 19:35, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 07:58:58AM +1000, Trejkaz wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 October 2005 06:03, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > > Well, "mandatory-to-implement" means must-implement in software, but > > > that doesn't mean that any particular deployment of that software must > > > deploy any particular feature. My understanding is that RFCs talk about > > > requirements for software implementation, not necessarily deployment. > > > > Do you suppose that Google have actually implemented the DIGEST-MD5 > > mechanism, and simply have the feature turned off on their deployment? > > :-) > > That doesn't matter. They offer service, not the software. If they > offered the software they could not call it "XMPP compliant"... That is > how I see it.
I guess by those rules then, no service is XMPP compliant by definition since
it only applies to software.
TX
--
Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Web site: http://trypticon.org/
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
pgposgnNEQCiB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
