Tijl Houtbeckers wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:00:52 +0100, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:[snip]The Jabber Council at the time had some feedback for the authorof the "protoJEP": http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards-jig/2004-September/006368.html However, the author did not respond to the questions or provide an updated version of his proposal.Actually there was a reply to these question raised, and some of those were answered before the council's decision (I guess you can't expect the council to read every message on this list). However, those replies were left unanswered as well (before and after the rejection).
Aha, thanks for the clarification. At the time I was in the middle of final changes to the XMPP RFCs prior to publication so perhaps I was not paying close enough attention to Standards-JIG postings.
Peter
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
