On 09.12.2005 06:05 (+0100), Vinod Panicker wrote: > I thought you said it was an encoding error. The encoding on these > stanzas look fine to me.
Google Talk said it doesn't like the encoding. ejabberd comes further and reports not authorised. > From what I see from the decoded response > that you are sending, the "realm" is missing, although its an optional > parameter IIRC - As far as I understood the SASL RFC, the realm is selected by the server and the client must pass it back as-is. My server doesn't set a realm, so nothing is sent back. > Usually, a not-authorized means that you are missing the right > credentials (incorrect username/password). Do check on that as the > first thing. Username + password are ok, I can log in using these in Psi (which uses the iq-auth thing instead of SASL, I haven't looked at that JEP yet). But I want to add the PLAIN mechanism anyway so I can test it with that one, too. -- Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Does the movement of the trees make the wind blow?" http://newsboard.unclassified.de - Unclassified NewsBoard Forum
