Gary are you listening? More importantly do you have any say in the matter?
On 12/22/05, Trejkaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 22 December 2005 21:08, Norman Rasmussen wrote: > > They should just be xmpp enabling aim ([EMAIL PROTECTED] anyone?), > > and then gtalk should just work on their s2s support. > > Now, that would be awesome for a number of reasons. Firstly, nobody would > ever need an AIM transport, unless in the future they turned the XMPP > interface back off. But secondly, that would be another 40 million users > which we could claim are on the XMPP network, making the XMPP network bigger > than every other one. ;-) > > TX > > -- > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web site: http://trypticon.org/ > GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73 > > > -- - Norman Rasmussen - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/
