Op zaterdag 21 januari 2006 19:23, schreef Yves Goergen: > Hello, > I was just pointed to the Wildfire Jabber server and took a closer look > at it, incl the feature comparison on jabber.org/software. Wildfire > looks really good. It has all the features I need, incl ICQ et al > transport link. The web configuration interface is the most exciting > feature for me. Otherwise both servers look quite similar in features. > Is there any argument on not using one of them?
Currently the big reason pro ejabberd is: it is the only open-source Jabber server with full XMPP compliancy. Might be helpful: http://www.process-one.net/en/projects/ejabberd/docs/features.pdf > Is there something I > should know when I choose one? I've seen that Wildfire doesn't support > Privacy Lists, but as no client supports them as well (especially Psi > that I use), Tkabber supports it AFAIK. > that isn't a too big deal. I'm currently running ejabberd > 0.7.5 but I'm going to upgrade to either 1.0 or Wildfire. I haven't seen > the ejabberd 1.0 web interface (if anything changed at it at all), You can preview a read-only version of ejabberd's web interface at: http://ejabberd.jabber.ru/online-demo-webadmin Notes: * The web interface of ejabberd 1.0.0 looks 99% the same as that of ejabberd 0.9.8. * The demo is only available in English, while in the real version there are more languages. <snip> -- Mvg, Sander Devrieze. xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ejabberd, the expandable Jabber daemon. -- http://ejabberd.jabber.ru/
