On 2/1/06, Ralph Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:54:45PM +0530, Vinod Panicker wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It seems that server behaviour for handling presence subscribe stanzas > > to non-existent users is undefined in the RFC. IMO, it should be > > silently dropped. > > RFC 3921 (XMPP IM), section 11.1, rule 2. > > > Also, what about roster set for non-existent users? If the server > > returns an error, it would give away existing account information. > > No entity can do a roster set on another account, as a server must > disregard the 'to' attribute on the <iq/> sent be the client. This is > described in section 7.2.
Thanks. I meant something else by the second question, but section 11.1 rule 2 satisfies that as well :) Thanks, Vinod.
