-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesus Cea wrote: > Robert B Quattlebaum, Jr. wrote: >>> Any particular reason why we are using "Jabber-ID" instead of "XMPP-ID"? > > +1
Are you saying +1 to his question or +1 to XMPP-ID? :-) I see several reasons for Jabber-ID: 1. Jabber-ID is historical. In other words, people recognize "Jabber-ID" but they don't recognize "XMPP-ID", see for instance documents such as <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-notify-02.txt>. 2. XMPP-ID might get confused with XMPP URI. We don't want people to include full XMPP URIs here (or at least I don't think we do, since the processing rules are a lot more complicated for full URIs). Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEBe3GNF1RSzyt3NURAkq1AJ9RyHUouMtBXvBy020UkviSitiEHQCfQfXn 3uaEnk/wTGL3njUr6MeStnY= =O0lj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
