On Thursday 02 March 2006 06:36, Norman Rasmussen wrote: > > This can be problematic for virtual hosting. Consider the following > > scenario: > > > > - - shakespeare.lit runs an XMPP server. > > > > - - shakespeare.lit hosts XMPP services for denmark.lit, montague.lit, > > capulet.lit, etc. > > > > There are two possibilities I can see. > > Don't forget option #3: > > Just like HTTPS, each hostname/certificate has to have it's own IP > address - this is so that we can tell which certificate to present > based on the IP the client has just connected to. > > Unfortunately it's a wastage of IP addresses, but it's something that > most server admins / cert issuers understand already.
Or, run each server on a different port.
How much does a block of 50,000 IP addresses cost, anyway? I always get
exhorbitant quotes back when I merely want to rent a block of 8.
TX
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web site: http://trypticon.org/
GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
pgpzVvIiPszZz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
