On 4/6/06, Robert McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Even if we're not doing google:roster, then there are other places where > we need to know if the server has extra features (google:relay auth > token, off the record, mail notifications...)
Google does not encourage the use of these private extensions because the extensions can be changed at any time. Please let us know which of the extensions you would like to see documented and supported in a formal way. > according to the standard in places (<presence type="unavailable"> > behaves like invisible, so the server sends us presence, messages and > iqs... something like <feature > var='presence-unavailable-behaves-like-invisible'/>). I will fix this instead of advertising the broken behavior. > +1 too, but in the meantime, how are we supposed to block users on > Google Talk? We discouarge the use of the extension, but don't prevent you from using the extension.
