-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sander Devrieze wrote: > Op dinsdag 25 april 2006 13:12, schreef Remko Troncon: >>> I believe it is worth to note that this XHTML compliancy is extremely >>> unique to ejabberd; I can't find *any* other instant messaging server >>> with a web interface that complies to an open standard of the W3C like >>> XHTML 1.0. This includes non-XMPP servers too. >> Not that I don't appreciate it, but is that a big deal ? > > Is it a big deal when the W3C defines nice standards and when people then not > implement them as defined? Maybe it is not a big feature from an end-users > point of view, that's true, but tolerating uncompliancy and closed protocols, > is a misfeature, especially for software that is based on open standards as > core technology.
Moreover, I cannot imagine someone writing XMPP software, taking care of well formed XML and namespaces, who - at the same time - produces a tag soup on their website. - -- Maciek xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-nr1 (Windows XP) iD8DBQFETgvN7knNPWzAbeURAllJAJwPwtInsqfK5SPSyUP0H5hx7W4XPwCfXfnF Z6MgLjRVMM73rtqRZbrF/u8= =5NjZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
