Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > [...] In the last time I saw a lot XMPP > > incompatible clients. Most even don't do string prepping. So you see > > some kind of empty nicknames in multi user conferences and so on. Maybe > > a kind of logo for XMPP compatible software and hardware would be nice > > because it's so easy to claim that software is XMPP compatible.
As different server implementations show different behaviour, it is useful to test them, too. I proposed writing a test software for this year's SoC[0] but unfortunately no student picked it. > We've talked about that for a long time. Maybe next year we'll finally > get serious about it -- the XMPP interop event next week is perhaps a > first step in that direction (i.e., it may result in some more automated > testing software). Is there testing software already? Possibly extensible? Stephan. [0] http://wiki.jabber.org/index.php/Summer_of_Code_2006_Project_Ideas#Generic_Server_Work
pgp46neAB9M4g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
