On Wednesday 01 November 2006 9:17 am, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Justin Karneges wrote: > > This seems unlikely > > though, as I think the RFC revision has already been made, and there was > > no consideration for these features. > > It is not accurate to say that "the RFC revision has already been made". > I published -00 versions of rfc3920bis and rfc3921bis, but that is the > start of discussion, not the end.
Well let's test the waters. :) I've put together some RFC text that unifies the acking mechanisms proposed by myself and Dave Cridland. I'll post it to standards-jig. -Justin
