Remko Tronçon wrote: > > It sounds like the right way to do this. We haven't implemented > responding to generic form requests (either in the IQ way or in > messages) yet, because nobody needed it. > thank you for the quick reply. any eta on psi 0.11? how much of an effort to add the required functionality? if not too much i can take a look at adding the required bits...
roelof.
