On 12/16/06, Magnus Henoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Upholding the difference between xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and xmpp://[EMAIL PROTECTED] is a battle that we can win, as long as we as a community are determined not to let it slip.
Actually it's very simple. As long as client authors do-it-right (xmpp uri parsing), then no-one will ever be able to create an invalid/mis-use-able xmpp uri. The only reason that html parsing is as terrible as it is, is because certain browsers *cough* insist on rending invalid pages. If the browser out there gave big warnings in large red letters that pages were invalid, then the pages would be fixed pretty quickly. -- - Norman Rasmussen - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/
