i think we had this discussion several times before. jabberd1 or jabberd 1.x tends always to confusion because all newbies to which i talked in jdev see jabberd2 as the successor of jabberd1 which is wrong.

Sander Devrieze wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre schreef:
Hey Matthias, that's great news. But don't you think that it's a bit odd to have "jabberd14 1.6"? :-) Maybe "jabberd1" is better...

"jabberd1" looks a bit like "jabberdl"; maybe another point of confusion :D


Reply via email to