Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > See here: > > http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis-00.html#rules
Hmm... I just noticed something.
Let's say we're pinging a client which does not support ping namespace:
Example 9. Ping Not Supported
<iq from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/chamber'
to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home'
id='ping345'
type='result'>
<ping xmlns='urn:xmpp:ping'/>
<error type='cancel'>
<service-unavailable xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas'/>
</error>
</iq>
Now 3921bis says:
3. Else if the JID is of the form <[EMAIL PROTECTED]/resource> and no
connected or available resource matches the full JID, the recipient's
server (...) MUST return a <service-unavailable/> stanza error to the
sender if it is an IQ stanza
So the reply above may mean both a pong and a not-pong, and it's
impossible to tell the difference.
BTW: What happened to feature-not-implemented?
--
Maciek A: It's against natural order of reading.
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Q: Why is that?
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] A: People answering above quoted text.
Q: What's the most annoying on newsgroups?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
