On Fri Feb 16 12:41:35 2007, Richard Dobson wrote:
It looks like you arn't sending completely valid xmpp xml, there
shouldn't really be an extra namespace declaration on the item
element as that element should already be in that namespace,
But that's still legal, as far as I know.
there are no such attributes of group or jid in privacy lists
That isn't legal, of course, and is the probable source of the error
- although an argument can be made that the server should be
rejecting this.
and you should really be sending the empty message element as
<message/> not <message></message>.
They're equivalent, according to the XML specs.
Not that I'm disagreeing that both this and the spurious namespace
shouldn't be changed, but they should have no effect other than the
octet count.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
