Tomasz Sterna Wrote: [Using C++ over Java or .Net]
> Actually pretty simple... > We need our communicator to work on these > P400/Win98 boxes that most of our users have... > (and these perform very well in standard offices) There are actually other options for that. We've deployed custom desktop clients built with .Net to Win98 and Windows ME boxes. Although the .Net platform itself won't run on those boxes, there's a product from RemoteSoft that compiles .NET code to native x86 (including all the .Net libraries), and you can then give your client a single .Exe that "just works". It's worked out quite well for us. We get the benefits of developing in .Net, but are able to deploy to a wider variety of platforms. -- Chris Mullins -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 2:48 AM To: Jabber software development list Subject: Re: [jdev] Windows stack Dnia 19-02-2007, pon o godzinie 10:34 -0800, Chris Mullins napisaÅ'(a): > At this point in time, there's really not any good reason to do C++ > development in the Windows world. -- Tomasz Sterna Xiaoka Grp. http://www.xiaoka.com/
