Hello Kevin, thanks for the feedback, I am just interested in research and found the 2 serverless descriptions for xep 174. I quoted the psi-list and merged the quotations together. You wrote "THERE is a serverless xep 174.." and before that chapter is quoted, *I* added, "IF .. there is a serverless jabber". There is no client till now, implementing serverless jabber, so IF is questionable for the technical side, HOW to do it. so it is not quite clear. As I am not the one with the idea of jabber 2 for serverless, the question is who to find the buddy in the next online session. A DHT is the best solution and it was suggested to proove that in the discussion with the writers of XEP 174. There are many IP messengers out, but with not answering the question, who to find the buddy in the next online session XEP 174 is a nonsense or STUB or whatever.. So my questions: Has ony client already started with XEP 174 implementation and *if*, how is the finding of the friends solved technically? and if not, is this a topic for elaborating XEP 174 with a DHT? Which one? or is that not a question for the implementers and protocol designers?
Kind Regards and sorry if there was a misunderstunding. Mike. PS: yes, I had a point, which is: OpenOffice needs a Email client (evolution or thunderbird). But that is another thing. PS2: I think a good development is made out of commitment, why waiting until somone is first with a buggy YEP 174 implementation, if the finding of the buddy could be made clear in the process before on the list of jabber development? 2007/10/23, Kevin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > <snip> > > You've taken conversation which happened on the Psi list and posted > it here, which I don't object to too much. However, you've also > edited what I said in that list to suit your purpose, actively adding > things which I didn't say and that is something I really do object to. > > > /K >
