On 10/26/07, Tomasz Sterna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dnia 26-10-2007, Pt o godzinie 12:32 +0530, Vinod Panicker pisze: > > I think it makes more sense to say that roster pushes should be sent > > to "active" resources that have requested the roster. > > [...] > > Another case is when a client representing a user resource "a" > > switches from available to active state [...] > > > > WDYAT? > > How do you define "active" state?
The state where the resource is bound to a resource id. > How do you switch to that state from available state? By sending a presence of type unavailable. Regards, Vinod.
