On Sunday December 9 2007, Tomasz Sterna wrote: > On So, 2007-12-08 at 19:01 +0100, Robin Redeker wrote: > > User A sends a message to the bare JID of user B which is not subscribed. > > User B answers to the full JID of user A. > > IIRC this full-jid chat binding is discouraged and messages should > always be exchanged between bare JIDs. > If you want to hold to a specific conversation thread, use the <thread/> > item.
I recall that, too, but can't remember where I read it. Is this documented anywhere? draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis-04/-05 currently has this to say about the topic (section 5.1.1): "If the message is being sent in reply to a message previously received from an address of the form <[EMAIL PROTECTED]/resource> (e.g., within the context of a chat session), the value of the 'to' address SHOULD be of the form <[EMAIL PROTECTED]/resource> rather than of the form <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> unless the sender has knowledge (via presence) that the intended recipient's resource is no longer available." Jakob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
