> My point is that the server can't just check the suubscription state in the > roster. Also it introduces a good argument for my proposed best practice of > sharing presence for ad-hoc chats/interactions: > http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis-05.html#message-chat
Yes, I've agreed that sharing presence when chatting makes sense for a while, so I agree with the best practice. It does seem weird to have that the client MUST allow this to be disabled though - currently, that section reads that a client is not XMPP compliant (i.e. it breaks a MUST in the RFC) if it follows the best practices in the RFC :) /K _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________
