Peter Saint-Andre a écrit : > Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: >> Peter Saint-Andre a écrit : >>> Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Following Peter last blog note [1] and XEP-0235, I'm pleased there is a >>>> formal definition on how to couple OAuth with XMPP but I'm somewhat >>>> disconcerted by the fact that the definition is per XMPP service. Why? >>>> XEP-035 specifies for a few of them (PubSub, MUC and Registration) >>>> but I'm >>>> wondering if that wouldn't have made more sense to define a service >>>> on its >>>> own. >>> Do you mean that an XMPP server could offer a generalized OAuth >>> service for use by things like pubsub components, MUC components, and >>> the XMPP server itself? >> >> Yes. > > Could you expand a bit on what you mean by that? I don't think XEP-0235 > (which I'm currently updating to reflect our discussions in Portland) > disallows a standalone OAuth service that's used by servers and > components, but that model seems to be a bit more sophisticated and > complex. > > /psa > >
Right. I can see it would indeed make it more complex and would prevent the solution to be implemented and deployed reasonnably soon. However I didn't mean your XEP was forbidding a standalone service, perhaps a note in that spirit would make it clear that indeed you can write such service. - Sylvain _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________
