On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Remko Tronçon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's a server limit you have to pick. I don't really see what that > limit would have to do with the read() buffer size, it's completely > independent.
My correlation was that the max buffer size could be a certain number of read()s, based on the read() buffer size. > To me, this means that you haven't solved the problem correctly, and > that you're still using the wrong type of parser that expects your > document to be complete. A real incremental parser never throws an > exception on an incomplete piece of XML of any kind. I'm also doubting > that you have the right test set to assume that your parser works. I've run out of XML parsers to use. What do you use? Ruby's REXML SAX2Parser raises an exception on malformed XML. libxml's SaxParser calls parser_error in the receiver, and requires a root element, starting and closing. That's an entire document, and yet one of the most widely used SaxParsers is libxml. There are no expat bindings for Ruby. If REXML finds this it raises an exception and stops parsing. If libxml finds this is calls on_parser_error with a useless string and keeps on parsing. libxml assumes the first element is the root element, and if there's no closing tag for that element before the end of the document it calls on_parser_error. I can ignore both of these conditions, but if I do that then I have no way to detect malformed XML. If your program doesn't have these problems, then what parser are you using? What type of parser, what library? Apparently it's very special. > cheers, > Remko -- Eric Will // rakaur -- _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________
