On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Pedro Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Oct 1, 2008, at 10:13 PM, Adam Pisoni wrote: > > > Most xmpp servers we send to send back a 503 if we send a message to a > > user who is offline. When we get a 503 we mark that JID as offline > > so we do not continue sending them messages. The real issue is gtalk, > > which supports offline messaging and never tells you whether a JID is > > offline. A few of our users have complained that they're still > > getting messages from us when they're offline, which gtalk them emails > > them. I know the rabbiter guys have talked about having the same > > problems. What is the best practice as far as how to deal with this. > > Do you expire resources eventually? Or probe if a resource hasn't > > been updated in some amount of time? > > I would either presence probe or IQ ping the resource every X hours if > no activity is detected. > > Not pretty, but this is the real world. > Ghosts happen. :) Sadly, this is the solution I use in components too. If you are supporting multiple resources it is the easiest solution. I have not come up with a better one for ghosts. > > Best regards, > -- > Pedro Melo > Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/ > XMPP ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Use XMPP! > > > _______________________________________________ > JDev mailing list > FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq > Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 > Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev > Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________
