Zhenchao Li wrote: > As far as I know the jingle protocol is kind of similar to the > original stream initiation(xep-0095) conceptually. Apart from jingle > being a newer, more general session negotiation protocol(general in the > sense that there are already video, voice calls applications built on > jingle) and SI practically being used only by SI file > transfer(xep-0096), what are the advantages that jingle has over SI? > Surely there are already clients that has support for jingle file > transfer(pidgin, gtalk) so we definitely will see more clients > implementing this, but, is there anything extra that jingle has brought > us so we can improve the file transfer process? What's the rationale > behind implementing file transfer over jingle given SI file transfer > already works fine?
Jingle FT allows to use any transport you want, and especially ICE-TCP that allow a better NAT traversal. -- Yann _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
