Yeah, 03 for now (the goal was to get something working with Chrome). And we will obviously work on supporting updated versions. Also, I had a brief chat with Eric from ProcessOne. They will work on putting a websocket component into ejabberd's core. I believe it would be great if all servers eventually added support for websockets.
Julien On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Pedro Melo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Sylvain Hellegouarch <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> On 4/5/11 8:43 AM, Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: > >> > What version of websockets do you support? > >> > I think the code says draft-03 which isn't the latest but with WS it's > >> > hard to be up-to-date. > >> > >> Thanks. The -06 draft has pretty good consensus in the HYBI WG, although > >> based on discussions in Prague last week I'd expect a few things to be > >> adjusted. > >> > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-06 > > > > Adjustments can have epic proportions on that list ;) > > True, but from some of the summaries I've read > (http://www.mnot.net/blog/2011/04/04/http_post for example) 0.6 seems > to be gaining consensus. > > Either way, awesome work. > > Bye, > -- > Pedro Melo > http://www.simplicidade.org/ > xmpp:[email protected] > mailto:[email protected] > _______________________________________________ > JDev mailing list > Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
