On 2013-10-28 22:24, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > We were talking about "Jabber" for communication with end users about > getting an IM account. Most end users (and even people at technical > conference) still call it Jabber. I see no reason to fight that > forever. Introduce it as Jabber or "you might know it as Jabber" but > then talk about XMPP. That's what I usually do. > > > I find it interesting that according to Google trends, although "xmpp > server" and "jabber server" are roughly equal, "jabber client" is > searched for roughly twice as much as "xmpp client". > > So if we're purely aiming at end users wanting IM accounts, then yes, > Jabber seems to be the obvious choice. I think this document essentially > aims at server administrators (who apparently use either equally), but I > suspect that the whole TLS thing would be most useful if it were > something server admins could brag about to their users; that suggests > using the Jabber mark.
So we'll need to Reclaim the Jabber™? :) I remember there being talk of getting the trade mark back from Cisco before, is time we finally did that? Something for the board to tackle? -- Kim "Zash" Alvefur
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
