G'day,

for years I have used decentralised, distributed, and federated with, in my head, the following meaning:

- decentralised: the ability to have several servers communicating together, the servers can be under the same domain (example.net can have several servers)

- distributed: 1 server = 1 user, no intermediate (not even DNS, so XMPP is not distributed according to this definition, but something like retroshare is)

- federated: the ability from servers of different domains (example.net and capulet.lit) to talk together, in both directions.

But after a talk I realise that the definitions accepted is not the same everywhere, e.g. Diaspora people talk about federation for what I call decentralisation. Actualy it's a bit tricky, because if one entity has 1000 servers but everybody is using the same domain, the data are centralised in the hands of the same entity.

So, what meaning do you put behind these words ? Are decentralisation and federation more or less synonyms ?

Sorry to put this on jdev@, I was not sure of which mailing list to use :)


Goffi
_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to