[jdjlist] Re: Vector synchronized get() method?

[Jesper Jorgensen]

Yes, I suppose if get was not synchronised it would give something like a dirty 
read.....
 
Jesper Jorgensen

         
        -----Original Message----- 
        From: James A. N. Stauffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
        Sent: Fri 10/05/2002 17:00 
        To: JDJList 
        Cc: 
        Subject: [jdjlist] Re: Vector synchronized get() method?
        
        

        Correct but consider 1 thread calling get while another thread calling
        remove or set.  Use ArrayList for an unsynchronized list.
        --- Jesper Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
        > Hi,
        > 
        > Does anyone have the answer to why the  get(int index) method in the
        > java.util.Vector class is synchronized?
        > Since it doesn't modify anything two threads can safely access it
        > concurrently - no?
        > 
        > thanks,
        > Jesper Jorgensen
        > 
        > PS.
        > 
N‡!jxÊ‹«™é›z»!Šš)¶*'²·Ÿz»h†Ûiÿü0Â̬r‰Ü¢oãjö¿–+-qù

        
        
        =====
        =    o o o o o o o . . .  __________________________ _____=======_||___
           o      _____           |  James A. N. Stauffer  | | Stauffer_James |
         .][__n_n_|DD[  ====____  | Spam food: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |   @yahoo.com   |
        >(________|__|_[________]_|________________________|_|________________|
        _/oo OOOOO oo`  ooo  ooo  'o¬o¬o              o¬o¬o` 'o¬o          o¬o`
        
        __________________________________________________
        Do You Yahoo!?
        Yahoo! Shopping - Mother's Day is May 12th!
        http://shopping.yahoo.com
        
        To change your membership options, refer to:
        http://www.sys-con.com/java/list.cfm
        

<<winmail.dat>>

To change your membership options, refer to:
http://www.sys-con.com/java/list.cfm