According to Alan they are exactly the same thing...
I wonder why then ...HP has a totally different bug database with threads
listed that arent listed in sun's
As he writes
People, in my experience, are way too quick
to point the finger at the JVM or OS as oppose to looking a little closer
to
home.
I really am unsure what that means......Is that a dig at me....and my
code...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Paul Franz"
<paulfranz To: "jdjlist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@email.com> cc:
Subject: [jdjlist] Re: Write Once, Run
Anywhere
05/30/2003 01:32
PM
Please respond
to "jdjlist"
And then there is IBM's JDK vs. Sun JDK. We found out the hard way at work
that the getFields method returns the fields in a different order. Yeah, I
know never assume.
Paul Franz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Carlamere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jdjlist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 1:01 PM
Subject: [jdjlist] Re: Write Once, Run Anywhere
>
> If we are talking about printing then yes Alan your right
>
> but I am talking about applications in general...
>
> 1 perfect example is JDBC..... HP's SDK handles it totally different
than
> suns JDK
>
> .......whatever I am not going to go on with HP vs SUN
>
> I really dont care what you believe I just know what I am experiencing
>
> Hardware has nothing to do with an apps code.. other than performance
>
>
>
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
>
> This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
> delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
> bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit
written
> agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
> for such purpose.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
>
>
>
>
>
> Alan Williamson
> <alan To: "jdjlist"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> @n-ary.com> cc:
> Subject: [jdjlist] Re:
Write Once, Run Anywhere
> 05/30/2003 12:33
> PM
> Please respond
> to "jdjlist"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ||| -----Original Message-----
> ||| From: Jason Carlamere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |||
> ||| Joseph.........Has it exactly right....
> |||
> ||| Linux,,,,,Windows,,,,and Solaris are all SUN JVM's
> |||
> ||| HP-UX .........MAC..........etc...are not SUN's they have their own
> ||| implementation
> |||
> ||| Hence...somethings are different
>
> Jason, you are barking too far up the wrong tree here with this.
>
> it has nothing to do with who makes the JVM; it's the OS and hardware.
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to jdjlist as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.sys-con.com/fusetalk
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to jdjlist as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.sys-con.com/fusetalk
---
You are currently subscribed to jdjlist as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sys-con.com/fusetalk
---
You are currently subscribed to jdjlist as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sys-con.com/fusetalk
