Omair, Apologies for posting across your recent mail. I incorrectly assumed I was registered on the jdk6-dev alias. I didn't see your mail until I began seaching the archives. My recent mail "code review request : RegistryImpl clean up (7102369)" also seeks to address the registryImpl issues that are present there.
I think you'll find that the 2nd changeset (7092186) is already in the 6open repo. My latest webrev should sync up the other RMI registry changes with the jdk7 base. I was planning on driving it through CR 7102369. Are you ok with the webrev below ? I can push that change if so ? http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.rmi.6open/ regards, Sean. ==== Hi, The recent security changes breaks some applications as rmiregistry needs to be started with the java.rmi.server.codebase property set. I would like to backport the following two changesets from jdk7u to address this problem: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/rev/7ed2fd310470 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/rev/2d10aa9d772a Does anyone have any thoughts or concerns? Thanks, Omair
