----- Original Message ----- > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/rev/78e01a6ca8d3 > > > > is a completely different changeset (but with the same bug ID) > > which > reverts changes in > > S7162476. The bug& original change explain why the empty > > BoolEditor > > and IntEditor classes were added, but not why all these classes > > were > moved > > back to sun.beans.editors. Can you explain this please? > > This fix does not revert changes from the 7162476 fix. It introduces > temporary classes in the sun.beans.editors package which extend > classes > from the com.sun.beans.editors package. The reason is the same: the > customer uses JavaBeans editors directly and he have no time to > update > its application before Java release. >
Ah ok. Can you point me to where that recent change was reviewed? > Thanks, > SAM > > On 03.09.2012 16:29, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >>>> Presumably we also want the consequent regression fix: > >> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/rev/78e01a6ca8d3 > >> > >> > As per Eng, this fix is only for 7ux and > >> > do we see the same issue with 6-open ? > >> > Sergei, please comment. > >> > >> The 7182135 issue is a temporary fix for the customer who can't > >> update > >> its application in time. We will not include this fix into JDK 8 > >> and, > >> probably, will remove it from JDK 7 later. The 7182135 issue is > >> not > >> the > >> regression fix because of the following warning: > >> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/faq-sun-packages-142232.html > >> > > > > This was mentioned on this review: > > > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-July/003715.html > > > > but: > > > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/rev/78e01a6ca8d3 > > > > is a completely different changeset (but with the same bug ID) > > which reverts changes in > > S7162476. The bug& original change explain why the empty > > BoolEditor > > and IntEditor classes were added, but not why all these classes > > were moved > > back to sun.beans.editors. Can you explain this please? > > > >> Thanks, > >> SAM > >> > >> On 01.09.2012 1:00, Abhijit Saha wrote: > >>> On 8/31/2012 1:41 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>> Approved. > >>>>> > >>>>> -kto > >>>>> > >>>>> On Aug 31, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Abhijit Saha wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> With Oracle security alert [1] went live yesterday, we've to > >>>>>> sync > >>>>>> one fix # 7162476 in OpenJDK6. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here's the webrev/changes for this merge/sync. > >>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asaha/6u35-ER-openJDK6/webrev.1/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please review& approve for this push also comment if any > >>>>>> concern. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> Abhijit > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] > >>>>>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alerts-086861.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Release Lead, Java SE Updates > >>>>>> Java Platform Group > >>>>>> Oracle Corporation. > >>>>>> (408)276-7564 > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Presumably we also want the consequent regression fix: > >>>> > >>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/rev/78e01a6ca8d3 > >>> As per Eng, this fix is only for 7ux and do we see the same issue > >>> with > >>> 6-open ? > >>> > >>> Sergei, developer of this fix, has been included here. > >>> > >>> Sergei, > >>> Please comment. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> Abhijit > >>> > >> > > > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
